UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce 705M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
410M 610 610M 705A 705M 800A GT 520MX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 32 EU) G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G4 G7 P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 705M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 705M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.09
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.84
+68.8%

Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms 705M by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1143977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.6214.23
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameGF119Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 September 2013 (12 years ago)11 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4832
Core clock speed475 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate3.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−100%
8
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Valorant 30−35
−19.4%
35−40
+19.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 4−5
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−46.2%
35−40
+46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 14−16
+25%
12
−25%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4
−75%
Valorant 30−35
−19.4%
35−40
+19.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 14−16
+36.4%
11
−36.4%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3
−133%
Valorant 30−35
−19.4%
35−40
+19.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Valorant 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
+0%
2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

This is how GeForce 705M and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 705M is 133% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 705M performs better in 4 tests (9%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) performs better in 32 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.09 1.84
Recency 27 September 2013 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 69% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
9600 GS OEM 9600 GS OEM
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4850 X2 4850 X2
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
ATI HD 3450 X2 3450 X2
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
GRID M10-8Q M10-8Q
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
ATI HD 4290 IGP 4290 IGP
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
RX 6500 6500
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS DDR2
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
RX 6800 3456SP 6800 3456SP
HD 6470M AMD HD 6470M
vs
R5 340X OEM 340X OEM
HD 6470M AMD HD 6470M
vs
R7 340 OEM 340 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce 705M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 705M or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.