Radeon RX 8050S vs GeForce 705M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 705M and Radeon RX 8050S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8050S outperforms 705M by a whopping 3150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1148 | 164 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.66 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | no data |
| GPU code name | GF119 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 (13 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 3.800 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0912 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | no data |
| TMUs | 8 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | no data |
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP content protection | + | - |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | - |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | no data |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3 | 94
+4600%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 80−85
+4050%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 80−85
+1560%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 80−85
+4050%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 100
+9900%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 150−160
+7800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 130−140
+2217%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 80−85
+1560%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10 | 140−150
+1500%
|
| Valorant | 30−35 | 210−220
+544%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27 | 270−280
+969%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 80−85
+4050%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16 | 450−500
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 96
+9500%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 150−160
+7800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 130−140
+2217%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 80−85
+1560%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 85−90
+8400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10 | 140−150
+1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8 | 156
+2129%
|
| Valorant | 30−35 | 210−220
+544%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 80−85
+4050%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16 | 450−500
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 85
+8400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 130−140
+2217%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 80−85
+1560%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10 | 140−150
+1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8 | 92
+1214%
|
| Valorant | 30−35 | 1100−1150
+3135%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 150−160
+7800%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 85−90
+2867%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 7−8 | 250−260
+3500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12 | 350−400
+3082%
|
| Valorant | 6−7 | 250−260
+4100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 100−105
+4900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 65−70
+3250%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 90−95
+9300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 75−80
+413%
|
| Valorant | 7−8 | 210−220
+3029%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 45−50
+2200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 45−50
+2200%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 95−100 | 95−100 |
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210 | 200−210 |
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 118 | 118 |
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Metro Exodus | 50−55 | 50−55 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95 | 90−95 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60 | 55−60 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24 | 21−24 |
This is how GeForce 705M and RX 8050S compete in popular games:
- RX 8050S is 4600% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 8050S is 9900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 8050S performs better in 36 tests (68%)
- there's a draw in 17 tests (32%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
