Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs GeForce 7000M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1569 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 4.5 (2008) |
| GPU code name | C67 | GL40 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 10 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 65 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | 10 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 1 October 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 7000M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
