Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs GeForce 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1389not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.32no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV45TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 July 2004 (22 years ago)13 August 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed425 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors222 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate6.800466.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs16288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length197 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s624.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 July 2004 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 260 Watt

6800 Ultra has 221% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6800 Ultra and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6800 Ultra or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.