Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6200 6200 AGP 6200 LE 6200 LE AGP 6200 LE AGP 512 MB 6200 LE PCI 6200 PCI 6200 SE TurboCache 6200 TurboCache 6200 X2 PCI 6600 AGP 6600 LE 6600 LE AGP 6600 VE
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6200 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

GeForce 6200
2004, $40
128 MB DDR
0.09

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms 6200 by a whopping 10611% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1537505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameNV43Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (21 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors146 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate1.200no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed275 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_2
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−125

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 22
+0%
22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.09 9.64
Recency 11 October 2004 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 10611% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200
vs
ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200
vs
GeForce 6500 GeForce 6500
6610 XL GeForce 6610 XL
vs
RX 6600 LE RX 6600 LE
6700 XL GeForce 6700 XL
vs
ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP 2X Rage PRO AGP 2X
GeForce 6800 GeForce 6800
vs
R9 M380 Mac Edition R9 M380 Mac Edition
GeForce 6800 GeForce 6800
vs
HD Graphics P4700 Graphics P4700
GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200
vs
GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-2
GeForce 6200 GeForce 6200
vs
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
6200 LE AGP 512 MB GeForce 6200 LE AGP 512 MB
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q
6200 LE PCI GeForce 6200 LE PCI
vs
HD Graphics P4700 Graphics P4700
FX 5700 EP GeForce FX 5700 EP
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU Xbox 360 GPU
FX 5700 EP GeForce FX 5700 EP
vs
Tesla C1060 Tesla C1060

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 88 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 49 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.