Quadro M3000 SE vs GeForce 6200 TurboCache

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV44 B2GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 December 2004 (21 years ago)2 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed350 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors75 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40034.56
Floating-point processing powerno data1.106 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2004 2 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm

M3000 SE has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6200 TurboCache and Quadro M3000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6200 TurboCache is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M3000 SE is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 TurboCache or Quadro M3000 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.