GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs 6200 TurboCache

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 6200 TurboCache and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

6200 TurboCache
2004
64 MB DDR
0.12
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024, $799
16 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
76.40
+63567%

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms 6200 TurboCache by a whopping 63567% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking151210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.64
Power efficiencyno data20.74
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV44 B2AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 December 2004 (21 years ago)8 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8448
Core clock speed350 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors75 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data285 Watt
Texture fill rate1.400689.0
Floating-point processing powerno data44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs4264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66
L1 Cacheno data8.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length165 mm310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

6200 TurboCache 0.12
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 76.40
+63567%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

6200 TurboCache 52
Samples: 259
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31831
+61113%
Samples: 10271

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1222
1440p-0−1146
4K-0−188

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.60
1440pno data5.47
4Kno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 197
+0%
197
+0%
Palworld 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+0%
196
+0%
Far Cry 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 172
+0%
172
+0%
Far Cry 5 197
+0%
197
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 196
+0%
196
+0%
Palworld 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 430
+0%
430
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 188
+0%
188
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210
+0%
210
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Metro Exodus 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
+0%
182
+0%
Metro Exodus 84
+0%
84
+0%
Palworld 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 76.40
Recency 15 December 2004 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 63567% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 TurboCache in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5155 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6200 TurboCache or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.