Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs GeForce 6150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameC51no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2004 (21 years ago)31 July 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed475 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology90 nmno data
Texture fill rate0.48no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs1no data
L2 Cacheno data576 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2004 31 July 2025

Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 20 years.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6150 and Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6150 is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate GeForce 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6150 or Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.