HD Graphics P3000 vs GeForce 610M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 610M with HD Graphics P3000, including specs and performance data.
610M outperforms HD Graphics P3000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1251 | 1260 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.55 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Generation 6.0 (2011) |
| GPU code name | GF119 | Sandy Bridge GT2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 December 2011 (14 years ago) | 1 February 2011 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | 995 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 5.904 | 16.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1417 TFLOPS | 0.2592 TFLOPS |
| Video decoders | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 2 |
| TMUs | 8 | 12 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 14.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6 |
| Valorant | 30−35
+14.8%
|
27−30 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4 |
| Far Cry 6 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7 |
| Valorant | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Far Cry 6 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14 |
| Valorant | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| Recency | 1 December 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
GeForce 610M has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.
HD Graphics P3000, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 610M and HD Graphics P3000.
Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P3000 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
