GeForce RTX 3090 vs 410M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 410M with GeForce RTX 3090, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 410M
2011
Up to 512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.65
RTX 3090
2020, $1,499
24 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
63.62
+9688%

RTX 3090 outperforms 410M by a whopping 9688% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.06
Power efficiency4.1914.06
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF119GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 September 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4810496
Core clock speed575 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors292 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate4.600556.0
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS35.58 TFLOPS
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4112
TMUs8328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cache64 KB10.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1219 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s936.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL+4.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 410M 0.65
RTX 3090 63.62
+9688%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 410M 272
Samples: 498
RTX 3090 26504
+9644%
Samples: 17668

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 410M 415
RTX 3090 61569
+14736%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 410M 1923
RTX 3090 127269
+6520%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 410M 996
RTX 3090 191142
+19091%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2238%
187
+2238%
1440p1−2
−11900%
120
+11900%
4K0−181

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.02
1440pno data12.49
4Kno data18.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−20800%
209
+20800%
Palworld 3−4
−7867%
239
+7867%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−17700%
178
+17700%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4980%
254
+4980%
Palworld 3−4
−7667%
233
+7667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
Valorant 27−30
−1189%
350−400
+1189%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1363%
270−280
+1363%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Dota 2 12−14
−1708%
217
+1708%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4840%
247
+4840%
Metro Exodus 0−1 176
Palworld 3−4
−6833%
208
+6833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−6050%
369
+6050%
Valorant 27−30
−1189%
350−400
+1189%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13500%
136
+13500%
Dota 2 12−14
−1675%
213
+1675%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4240%
217
+4240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2933%
182
+2933%
Valorant 27−30
−957%
296
+957%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−5133%
157
+5133%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−11450%
231
+11450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−16600%
500−550
+16600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−19600%
197
+19600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−15200%
153
+15200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%
Palworld 1−2
−11900%
120
+11900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1113%
182
+1113%
Valorant 6−7
−5217%
300−350
+5217%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 349
+0%
349
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 270
+0%
270
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 172
+0%
172
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%
Far Cry 5 208
+0%
208
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 309
+0%
309
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 171
+0%
171
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 183
+0%
183
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 115
+0%
115
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 171
+0%
171
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
Palworld 96
+0%
96
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 113
+0%
113
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Dota 2 202
+0%
202
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+0%
153
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 72
+0%
72
+0%

This is how GeForce 410M and RTX 3090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 is 2238% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 is 11900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3090 is 20800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 performs better in 33 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 31 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 63.62
Recency 5 January 2011 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 350 Watt

GeForce 410M has 2817% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090, on the other hand, has a 9688% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 410M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 410M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 352 votes

Rate GeForce 410M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 80399 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 410M or GeForce RTX 3090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.