Arc 3 A350M vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1329not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.55no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameC89DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (16 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors486 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20055.20
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce 320M has 9% lower power consumption.

Arc 3 A350M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and Arc 3 A350M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while Arc 3 A350M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 68 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Arc 3 A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or Arc 3 A350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.