Arc A310 vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.78
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC89DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (16 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1750 MHz
Number of transistors486 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20056.00
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs1632
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data124.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 30 Watt

320M Mac Edition has 30% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M Mac Edition and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate GeForce 320M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 315 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M Mac Edition or Arc A310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.