GMA 3150 vs GeForce 305M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13611617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.99no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGT218Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed525 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors260 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2000.8
Floating-point processing power0.0368 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
Gigaflops55no data
ROPs41
TMUs82
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedUp to 700 (DDR3), Up to 700 (GDDR3) MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 305M 150
+7400%
Samples: 3
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Palworld 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Palworld 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Palworld 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 13 Watt

GeForce 305M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 305M and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 305M or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.