Quadro T1000 Mobile vs GeForce 3 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.29
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2002 (24 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speedno data1395 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors27 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data69.84
Floating-point processing powerno data2.235 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width32 / 64 / 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2002 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 3 Go has 2400% lower power consumption.

T1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 3 Go and Quadro T1000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 3 Go is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce 3 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 207 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 3 Go or Quadro T1000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.