Radeon RX 9070 XT vs GeForce 210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 210 and Radeon RX 9070 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 210
2009, $29
512 MB GDDR2, 30 Watt
0.35
RX 9070 XT
2025, $599
16 GB GDDR6, 304 Watt
64.48
+18323%

9070 XT outperforms 210 by a whopping 18323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137832
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.77
Power efficiency0.8816.48
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT218SNavi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)6 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed589 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2970 MHz
Number of transistors260 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Watt304 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.160760.3
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache32 KB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 210 0.35
RX 9070 XT 64.48
+18323%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 210 145
Samples: 7045
RX 9070 XT 26918
+18464%
Samples: 18079

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2206
+20500%
1440p0−1116
4K-0−173

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.492.91
+90.1%
1440pno data5.16
4Kno data8.21
  • RX 9070 XT has 90% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 200−210 200−210
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Resident Evil 4 Remake 190−200 190−200

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 200−210 200−210
Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 296 296
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 200−210 200−210
Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 285 285
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180 170−180
Metro Exodus 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 497 497
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 270 270
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 257 257
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 130−140
Metro Exodus 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 90−95
Far Cry 5 260 260
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197 197

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 70−75 70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168 168
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 152 152
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how GeForce 210 and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 20500% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 64.48
Recency 12 October 2009 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 304 Watt

GeForce 210 has 90% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 18323% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 90% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 4119 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3947 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.