GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs 210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 210 with GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 210
2009, $29
512 MB GDDR2, 30 Watt
0.35
RTX 4070 Mobile
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
46.43
+13166%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms 210 by a whopping 13166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8831.51
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT218SAD106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (17 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164608
Core clock speed589 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors260 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Watt115 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.160244.1
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cache32 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 210 0.35
RTX 4070 Mobile 46.43
+13166%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 210 146
Samples: 7057
RTX 4070 Mobile 19462
+13230%
Samples: 14033

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1124
1440p0−170
4K-0−143

Cost per frame, $


FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 250−260 250−260
Cyberpunk 2077 135 135
Hogwarts Legacy 108 108
Resident Evil 4 Remake 160 160

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 172 172
Cyberpunk 2077 115 115
Far Cry 5 139 139
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 99 99
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 146 146
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 97 97
Dota 2 178 178
Far Cry 5 133 133
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 144 144
Hogwarts Legacy 87 87
Metro Exodus 111 111
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 229 229
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 87 87
Dota 2 167 167
Far Cry 5 123 123
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 76 76
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 116
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 94 94
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 90 90
Metro Exodus 69 69
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 54 54
Far Cry 5 112 112
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
Hogwarts Legacy 50 50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89 89

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130 120−130

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 43 43
Grand Theft Auto V 90 90
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35 30−35
Metro Exodus 44 44
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71 71
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 24 24
Dota 2 146 146
Far Cry 5 61 61
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Hogwarts Legacy 26 26
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 70−75

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 46.43
Recency 12 October 2009 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 115 Watt

GeForce 210 has 74% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 13166% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 4121 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2717 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.