Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs GRID M60-8Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M6-8Q M60-1Q M60-2Q M60-4A M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M60-8Q with Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), including specs and performance data.

GRID M60-8Q
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
9.32
+64.1%

M60-8Q outperforms 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking521659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.2029.29
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Vega Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)7 January 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed557 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate150.8no data
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+50%
20
−50%
1440p35−40
+45.8%
24
−45.8%
4K27−30
+50%
18
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 97
+0%
97
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 56
+0%
56
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 8
+0%
8
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+0%
8
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 49
+0%
49
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 22
+0%
22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GRID M60-8Q and RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • GRID M60-8Q is 50% faster in 1080p
  • GRID M60-8Q is 46% faster in 1440p
  • GRID M60-8Q is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.32 5.68
Recency 30 August 2015 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

GRID M60-8Q has a 64% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The GRID M60-8Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M60-8Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
P102-100 P102 100
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
vs
Tesla M6 X2 Mobile M6 X2 Mobile
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
GMA X4500HD X4500HD
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
GRID RTX T10-8 RTX T10-8
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 Mobile Refresh
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
9500 GT Rev. 3 9500 GT Rev. 3
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
Arc Pro A60M A60M
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
vs
Radeon 880M 880M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 873 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M60-8Q or Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.