Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.09
+189%

M3-3020 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking601895
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
GPU code nameGM107no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (10 years ago)1 August 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1033 MHz720 / 775 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate52.24no data
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p80−85
+176%
29
−176%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Palworld 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GRID M3-3020 is 176% faster in 900p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.09 2.45
Recency 18 May 2016 1 August 2013

GRID M3-3020 has a 189% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The GRID M3-3020 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
vs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
MX450 N18S-G5 GeForce MX450 N18S-G5
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
MX450 25W GeForce MX450 25W
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
Quadro P620 NVIDIA Quadro P620
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
HD 6970M Rebrand HD 6970M Rebrand
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
GeForce 720M GeForce 720M
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
FX 5900 XT FX 5900 XT
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
8600M GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
GRID M3-3020 NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
vs
ATI 2260 PCI FirePro 2260 PCI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.