Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs GRID K520Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGK104Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 July 2014 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2512
Core clock speed745 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1750 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×256.00
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×21.792 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×216
TMUs128 ×232
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 246% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K520Q and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K520Q is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K520Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 24 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K520Q or Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.