HD Graphics P4700 vs GRID K520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking563not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.91no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameGK104Haswell GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (13 years ago)1 June 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×2160
Core clock speed745 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×210.40
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs128 ×28
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data
L3 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 86 Watt

GRID K520 has an age advantage of 1 month.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has a 21% more advanced lithography process, and 62% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K520 and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K520 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics P4700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GRID K520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K520 or HD Graphics P4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.