GeForce4 460 Go vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K260Q with GeForce4 460 Go, including specs and performance data.

GRID K260Q
2013, $937
2 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
7.08
+70700%

K260Q outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 70700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6021588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency2.43no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGK104NV17 A5
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2013 (13 years ago)14 October 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362
Core clock speed745 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.361.000
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1284
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K260Q 7.08
+70700%
GeForce4 460 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K260Q 2949
+58880%
Samples: 4
GeForce4 460 Go 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 24 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.08 0.01
Recency 28 June 2013 14 October 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GRID K260Q has a 70700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID K260Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K260Q is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 460 Go is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K260Q or GeForce4 460 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.