Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GRID K2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K200 K280Q K500 K520 K560Q Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K2 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GRID K2
2013, $5,199
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.57

T1200 Mobile outperforms K2 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GRID K2 GRID K2
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking627355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.2675.46
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK104TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2013 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×21024
Core clock speed745 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors3.54 billion4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36 ×291.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×232
TMUs128 ×264
L1 Cache128 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1751.2
CUDA3.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−176%
58
+176%
1440p12−14
−175%
33
+175%
4K30−35
−170%
81
+170%

Cost per frame, $

1080p247.57no data
1440p433.25no data
4K173.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how GRID K2 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 176% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 175% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 170% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.57 17.54
Recency 11 May 2013 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 167% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K2 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
GRID K2 GRID K2
vs
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
Arc Pro A60 A60
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
vs
GeForce G210M G210M
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
NVS 5100M 5100M
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
ATI HD 4350 AGP 4350 AGP
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
7900 GT 7900 GT
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 5000 Blackwell
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server 4500 Blackwell Server
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
GT 120 Mac Edition 120 Mac Edition
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
R7 350X OEM 350X OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 14 votes

Rate GRID K2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 171 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K2 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.