Arc A310 vs GRID K100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (13 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed850 MHz1750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1750 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6056.00
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs1632
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache16 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA3.0-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 30 Watt

Arc A310 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K100 and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 315 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K100 or Arc A310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.