Tegra X1 vs GRID K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1020not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.93no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK107GM20B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 March 2013 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$4,140 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192 ×4256
Core clock speed850 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1.27 billion2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60 ×416.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×416
TMUs16 ×416
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×4System Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit ×4System Shared
Memory clock speed891 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s ×4no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2.175-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Tegra X1 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 767% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K1 and Tegra X1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K1 is a workstation graphics card while Tegra X1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate GRID K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 175 votes

Rate Tegra X1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K1 or Tegra X1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.