Arc Pro A60M vs GRID K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1016not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.93no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK107DG2-256
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 March 2013 (13 years ago)6 June 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,140 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192 ×42048
Core clock speed850 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60 ×4166.4
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS ×45.325 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×464
TMUs16 ×4128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s ×4256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2013 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Arc Pro A60M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 37% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K1 and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K1 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate GRID K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 23 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K1 or Arc Pro A60M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.