GeForce4 410 Go vs GRID A100A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGA100NV17 A3
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (6 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912no data
Core clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHzno data
Number of transistors54,200 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Wattno data
Texture fill rate434.20.8
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1922
TMUs4324
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 MB
Memory bus width6144 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

GRID A100A has an age advantage of 18 years, a 307100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation graphics card while GeForce4 410 Go is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID A100A or GeForce4 410 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.