T400 vs GMA X4500HD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.38
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEaglelakeTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2008 (18 years ago)6 May 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed533 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate2.13234.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 30 Watt

GMA X4500HD has 131% lower power consumption.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500HD and T400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4500HD is a desktop graphics card while T400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate GMA X4500HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 413 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X4500HD or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.