Radeon RX 550X Mobile vs GMA X3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.81
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBearlakePolaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 August 2007 (19 years ago)11 April 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed667 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1287 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.33651.48
Floating-point processing powerno data1.647 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2007 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 50 Watt

GMA X3500 has 74% lower power consumption.

RX 550X Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 84% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X3500 and Radeon RX 550X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X3500 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate GMA X3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 38 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X3500 or Radeon RX 550X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.