Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GMA 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated689
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.47
ArchitectureGeneration 3.5 (2005)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameLakeportVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2005 (21 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data576
Core clock speed166 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.66no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2005 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

GMA 950 has 114% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 9, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 950 and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 194 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 36 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 950 or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.