GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs GMA 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 3.5 (2005)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLakeportC78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2005 (21 years ago)6 May 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed166 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate0.664.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2005 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 40 Watt

GMA 950 has 471% lower power consumption.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 950 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 950 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 193 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 950 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.