RTX A500 vs GMA 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.26
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCedarviewGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed640 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate2.560113.3
Floating-point processing power0.04096 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 60 Watt

GMA 3650 has 362% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3650 and RTX A500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3650 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3650 or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.