Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GMA 3150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162579
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.92
Power efficiencyno data15.96
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code namePineviewNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)3 March 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed400 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors123 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8413.0
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs2160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1
RX 6700 XT 19712
+985500%
Samples: 14958

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HDno data143
1440pno data77
4Kno data45

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.35
1440pno data6.22
4Kno data10.64

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 349 349
Cyberpunk 2077 119 119
Hogwarts Legacy 170 170
Resident Evil 4 Remake 257 257

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 99 99
Far Cry 5 178 178
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 128 128
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 206 206
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 90 90
Dota 2 175 175
Far Cry 5 169 169
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 161 161
Hogwarts Legacy 99 99
Metro Exodus 119 119
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223 223
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 85 85
Dota 2 139 139
Far Cry 5 159 159
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 74 74
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127 127
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126 126
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Metro Exodus 71 71
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 56 56
Far Cry 5 137 137
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
Hogwarts Legacy 53 53
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105 100−105

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 130−140

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 32 32
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35 30−35
Metro Exodus 43 43
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 74
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 25 25
Dota 2 106 106
Far Cry 5 71 71
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
Hogwarts Legacy 29 29
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 3 March 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 230 Watt

GMA 3150 has 94% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 84% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3150 and Radeon RX 6700 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3150 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8740 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3150 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.