Arc A550M vs GMA 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.25
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBearlakeDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600262.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 60 Watt

GMA 3100 has 362% lower power consumption.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3100 and Arc A550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 339 votes

Rate GMA 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 102 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3100 or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.