Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FireStream 9250 and Quadro NVS 280 PCI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FireStream 9250
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.79
+13850%

FireStream 9250 outperforms 280 PCI by a whopping 13850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8541575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.440.12
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRV770NV34 B1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (18 years ago)28 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed625 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors956 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate25.001.100
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs404
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FireStream 9250 2.79
+13850%
NVS 280 PCI 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FireStream 9250 1164
+14450%
Samples: 2
NVS 280 PCI 8
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 0.02
Recency 16 June 2008 28 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 13 Watt

FireStream 9250 has a 13850% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 173% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCI, on the other hand, has 1054% lower power consumption.

The FireStream 9250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 280 PCI in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or Quadro NVS 280 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.