GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs FirePro W9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W9100 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W9100
2014
16 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
18.60
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
2025
12 GB GDDR7, 60 Watt
53.73
+189%

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms W9100 by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.2369.28
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameHawaiiGB205
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 March 2014 (12 years ago)March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28165888
Core clock speed930 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1447 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate163.7266.2
Floating-point processing power5.238 TFLOPS17.04 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs176184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache704 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W9100 18.60
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 53.73
+189%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W9100 7747
Samples: 39
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 22386
+189%
Samples: 3018

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−202%
136
+202%
1440p27−30
−196%
80
+196%
4K18−20
−217%
57
+217%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 155
+0%
155
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 244
+0%
244
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 341
+0%
341
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 142
+0%
142
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Palworld 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130
+0%
130
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how FirePro W9100 and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 202% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 196% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 217% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.60 53.73
Recency 26 March 2014 on March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 60 Watt

FirePro W9100 has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 189% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W9100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate FirePro W9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 510 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W9100 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.