GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs FirePro W8100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
S9100 S9150 S9170 W8000 W8100 W9100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W8100 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W8100
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 220 Watt
15.83
+24.2%

W8100 outperforms 1050 Ti Max-Q by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.5713.15
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameHawaiiGP107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 June 2014 (12 years ago)3 January 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed824 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1417 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate131.868.02
Floating-point processing power4.219 TFLOPS2.177 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
L1 Cache640 KB288 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
G-SYNC support-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W8100 15.83
+24.2%
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 12.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W8100 6594
+24.1%
Samples: 60
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5313
Samples: 2116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+22.8%
57
−22.8%
1440p35−40
+20.7%
29
−20.7%
4K21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+0%
67
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how FirePro W8100 and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W8100 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W8100 is 21% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro W8100 is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.83 12.75
Recency 23 June 2014 3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro W8100 has a 24% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 193% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
7300 GS 7300 GS
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
ATI V9800P V9800P
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 2260 PCIe x1
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
FX 1100 1100
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
Quadro4 100 NVS PCI 100 NVS PCI
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
P102-100 100
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
FirePro M3100 M3100
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
7050 + nForce 630i 7050 + nForce 630i
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
Graphics 512SP 512SP
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
Vega 9 Mobile 9 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 22 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 116 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W8100 or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.