GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs FirePro W8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1650 Mobile 1650 Max-Q 1650 Mobile Refresh 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Mobile 1660 Max-Q 1660 Ti Mobile 1660 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W8000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W8000
2012, $1,599
4 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
9.82
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.71
+90.5%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms W8000 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking499331
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.45no data
Power efficiency3.3828.95
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiTU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 June 2012 (14 years ago)23 April 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed900 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate100.895.04
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11264
L1 Cache448 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W8000 9.82
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 18.71
+90.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W8000 4091
Samples: 48
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+90.6%
Samples: 5986

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−93.3%
58
+93.3%
1440p21−24
−110%
44
+110%
4K12−14
−108%
25
+108%

Cost per frame, $

1080p53.30no data
1440p76.14no data
4K133.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 123
+0%
123
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50
+0%
50
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 181
+0%
181
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 41
+0%
41
+0%
Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 13
+0%
13
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how FirePro W8000 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 93% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 110% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 108% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.82 18.71
Recency 14 June 2012 23 April 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 91% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W8000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
RX 6500 Radeon RX 6500
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
FirePro S7000 AMD FirePro S7000
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
FirePro S9000 AMD FirePro S9000
vs
GeForce4 MX 420 MX 420
FirePro S9000 AMD FirePro S9000
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
FirePro W5000 AMD FirePro W5000
vs
Xbox Series X GPU Xbox Series X GPU
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
GTX 1050 GTX 1050
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
FirePro W9000 AMD FirePro W9000
vs
HD 8970M HD 8970M
FirePro W9000 AMD FirePro W9000
vs
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
FirePro W9000 AMD FirePro W9000
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
FirePro W9000 AMD FirePro W9000
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2029 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W8000 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.