GeForce 9800 GT vs FirePro W7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7100 with GeForce 9800 GT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7100
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 400 Watt
13.82
+1112%

W7100 outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 1112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4261136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiency7.190.71
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTongaG92
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 August 2014 (12 years ago)21 July 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792112
Core clock speed920 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate103.033.60
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11256
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm229 mm
Heightno data1-slot
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W7100 13.82
+1112%
9800 GT 1.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W7100 5794
+1112%
Samples: 227
9800 GT 478
Samples: 3519

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.82 1.14
Recency 12 August 2014 21 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 105 Watt

FirePro W7100 has a 1112% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

9800 GT, on the other hand, has 74% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 83 votes

Rate FirePro W7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1658 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7100 or GeForce 9800 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.