RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs FirePro W6150M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W6150M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

W6150M
2015
4 GB GDDR5
5.66
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
52.69
+831%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms W6150M by a whopping 831% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data37.06
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSaturnAD104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 November 2015 (10 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687424
Core clock speed1075 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rate51.60386.3
Floating-point processing power1.651 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs48232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cache192 KB7.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

W6150M 5.66
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.69
+831%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W6150M 2358
Samples: 4
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 21950
+831%
Samples: 451

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.66 52.69
Recency 12 November 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 831% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W6150M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 47 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W6150M or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.