Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4300 with Iris Xe Graphics MAX, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W4300
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.95
+39.3%

W4300 outperforms Graphics MAX by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking608736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7713.08
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBonaireDG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (10 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate44.6479.20
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs4848
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W4300 6.95
+39.3%
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 4.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W4300 2894
+39.2%
Samples: 68
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 1759
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.95 4.22
Recency 1 December 2015 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

FirePro W4300 has a 39% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 64% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics MAX in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 254 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or Iris Xe Graphics MAX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.