GeForce RTX 3060 vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4300 with GeForce RTX 3060, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W4300
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.90

RTX 3060 outperforms W4300 by a whopping 484% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking612120
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.49
Power efficiency10.7618.47
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBonaireGA106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed930 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64199.0
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS12.74 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs48112
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L1 Cache192 KB3.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length171 mm242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro W4300 6.90
RTX 3060 40.27
+484%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W4300 2894
Samples: 69
RTX 3060 16883
+483%
Samples: 3051

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro W4300 11168
RTX 3060 88251
+690%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−83.2%
107
1440p10−1260
+500%
4K6−7
−85%
40

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.07
1440pno data5.48
4Kno data8.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230 220−230
Cyberpunk 2077 79 79
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100 95−100
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120 110−120

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 220−230
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Far Cry 5 146 146
Fortnite 170−180 170−180
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
Valorant 240−250 240−250

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 220−230
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 75 75
Dota 2 156 156
Far Cry 5 135 135
Fortnite 170−180 170−180
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
Grand Theft Auto V 141 141
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100 95−100
Metro Exodus 81 81
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 179 179
Valorant 240−250 240−250

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 64 64
Dota 2 147 147
Far Cry 5 127 127
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 150−160
Hogwarts Legacy 56 56
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87 87
Valorant 240−250 240−250

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 170−180

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 100−110
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 280−290
Grand Theft Auto V 81 81
Metro Exodus 50 50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 39 39
Far Cry 5 94 94
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 110−120
Hogwarts Legacy 40 40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 72

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Grand Theft Auto V 82 82
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 24−27
Metro Exodus 32 32
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65 65
Valorant 250−260 250−260

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 18 18
Dota 2 115 115
Far Cry 5 48 48
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 75−80
Hogwarts Legacy 22 22
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 50−55

This is how FirePro W4300 and RTX 3060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is 494% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 is 500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 is 567% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.90 40.27
Recency 1 December 2015 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 170 Watt

FirePro W4300 has 71% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060, on the other hand, has a 484% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 40859 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or GeForce RTX 3060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.