Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs FirePro W4150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.80
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameMarsDG1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release dateno data31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate20.4079.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs2448
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4 GB/s2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4150M and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4150M is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 292 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4150M or Iris Xe MAX Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.