UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs FirePro V7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A300 A320 V5900 V7900 V7900 SDI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V7900 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V7900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.42
+24.9%

V7900 outperforms Graphics G4 48EUs by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking671724
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.8011.99
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameCaymanTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 May 2011 (15 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128048
Core clock speed725 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how FirePro V7900 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • FirePro V7900 is 13% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.42 4.34
Recency 24 May 2011 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 28 Watt

FirePro V7900 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 439% lower power consumption.

The FirePro V7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
FirePro V5900 AMD FirePro V5900
vs
UHD Graphics 64EU Graphics 64EU
FirePro V5900 AMD FirePro V5900
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
FirePro V7900 AMD FirePro V7900
vs
R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
FirePro V7900 AMD FirePro V7900
vs
FX 3450 FX 3450
FirePro V7900 AMD FirePro V7900
vs
RX 550X RX 550X
V7900 SDI AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
vs
ATI HD 2400 HD 2400
V7900 SDI AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
V7900 SDI AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
vs
RX 6600S RX 6600S
V7900 SDI AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
vs
H800 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
V7900 SDI AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 20 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 567 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.