Radeon RX 7700 XT vs FirePro V7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V7900 with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V7900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.41
RX 7700 XT
2023, $449
12 GB GDDR6, 245 Watt
54.43
+906%

7700 XT outperforms V7900 by a whopping 906% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking67855
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.45
Power efficiency2.8117.30
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameCaymanNavi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (15 years ago)25 August 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803456
Core clock speed725 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00549.5
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cache320 KB768 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V7900 5.41
RX 7700 XT 54.43
+906%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V7900 2264
Samples: 81
RX 7700 XT 22772
+906%
Samples: 2988

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20185
+928%
1440p10−12102
+920%
4K5−659
+1080%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.43
1440pno data4.40
4Kno data7.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 193 193
Resident Evil 4 Remake 229 229

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 344 344
Cyberpunk 2077 158 158
Far Cry 5 188 188
Fortnite 240−250 240−250
Forza Horizon 4 278 278
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 243 243
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 132 132
Far Cry 5 181 181
Far Cry 6 179 179
Fortnite 240−250 240−250
Forza Horizon 4 272 272
Grand Theft Auto V 166 166
Metro Exodus 152 152
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 295 295
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 122 122
Far Cry 5 167 167
Forza Horizon 4 231 231
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168 168
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 240−250 240−250

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 127 127
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 400−450
Far Cry 6 122 122
Grand Theft Auto V 105 105
Metro Exodus 90 90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 80 80
Far Cry 5 157 157
Forza Horizon 4 197 197
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120 120

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 31 31
Far Cry 6 63 63
Grand Theft Auto V 112 112
Metro Exodus 57 57
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89 89
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 36 36
Far Cry 5 82 82
Forza Horizon 4 134 134
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how FirePro V7900 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 928% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 920% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 1080% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.41 54.43
Recency 24 May 2011 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 245 Watt

FirePro V7900 has 38% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 906% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V7900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 20 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2918 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 or Radeon RX 7700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.