GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs FirePro V7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V7900 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V7900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.40
RTX 4070 Ti
2023, $799
12 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
75.16
+1292%

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms V7900 by a whopping 1292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking68013
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.41
Power efficiency2.8120.56
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCaymanAD104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12807680
Core clock speed725 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate58.00626.4
Floating-point processing power1.856 TFLOPS40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs80240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache320 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length279 mm285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V7900 5.40
RTX 4070 Ti 75.16
+1292%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V7900 2264
Samples: 81
RTX 4070 Ti 31509
+1292%
Samples: 15731

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18223
+1294%
1440p10−12140
+1300%
4K6−786
+1333%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.58
1440pno data5.71
4Kno data9.29

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 236 236
Hogwarts Legacy 160 160
Resident Evil 4 Remake 292 292

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 218 218
Far Cry 5 211 211
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 147 147
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 185 185
Dota 2 259 259
Far Cry 5 203 203
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 178 178
Hogwarts Legacy 126 126
Metro Exodus 197 197
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 453 453
Valorant 450−500 450−500

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 167 167
Dota 2 243 243
Far Cry 5 189 189
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 118 118
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221 221
Valorant 450−500 450−500

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 240−250 240−250
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 156 156
Metro Exodus 131 131
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 105 105
Far Cry 5 182 182
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 270−280
Hogwarts Legacy 86 86
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210 200−210

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Grand Theft Auto V 172 172
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70 65−70
Metro Exodus 84 84
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149 149
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 48 48
Dota 2 226 226
Far Cry 5 111 111
Forza Horizon 4 240−250 240−250
Hogwarts Legacy 47 47
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how FirePro V7900 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1294% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 1333% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.40 75.16
Recency 24 May 2011 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 285 Watt

FirePro V7900 has 47% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1292% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 90% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V7900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V7900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 20 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8589 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V7900 or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.