GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs FirePro V5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5900 with GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V5900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
2.84

RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms V5900 by a whopping 1257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking846135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.9325.93
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCaymanGA104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 May 2011 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126144
Core clock speed600 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20296.6
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS18.98 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs32192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache128 KB6 MB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length230 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V5900 2.84
RTX 3080 Mobile 38.55
+1257%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V5900 1182
Samples: 153
RTX 3080 Mobile 16060
+1259%
Samples: 3489

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−1325%
114
+1325%
1440p5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%
4K3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 212
+0%
212
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Palworld 119
+0%
119
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140
+0%
140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+0%
205
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+0%
194
+0%
Palworld 115
+0%
115
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 188
+0%
188
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+0%
131
+0%
Metro Exodus 100
+0%
100
+0%
Palworld 100
+0%
100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+0%
191
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 134
+0%
134
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+0%
157
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106
+0%
106
+0%
Valorant 179
+0%
179
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Palworld 93
+0%
93
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+0%
130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Palworld 68
+0%
68
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
Palworld 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+0%
70
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 35
+0%
35
+0%

This is how FirePro V5900 and RTX 3080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 1325% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 1360% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 1333% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 38.55
Recency 24 May 2011 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt

FirePro V5900 has 53% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1257% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 54 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 885 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5900 or GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.