Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs ATI FirePro V5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
V3700 V3750 V3800 V4800 V5700 V5800 V5800 DVI V7770 V7800 V8700 V8750 V9800
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3000 Mobile 3000 Max-Q 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 X2 Mobile 4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5800 with Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

ATI V5800
2010, $479
1 GB GDDR5, 74 Watt
3.40

RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms V5800 by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking797321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency3.5525.00
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJuniperTU106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date26 April 2010 (16 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002304
Core clock speed690 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1215 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate27.60175.0
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPS5.599 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache80 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI V5800 3.40
RTX 3000 Max-Q 19.39
+470%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI V5800 1415
RTX 3000 Max-Q 8079
+471%
Samples: 166

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−517%
74
+517%
1440p7−8
−543%
45
+543%
4K5−6
−500%
30
+500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p39.92no data
1440p68.43no data
4K95.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+0%
97
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 103
+0%
103
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how ATI V5800 and RTX 3000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 517% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 543% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is 500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.40 19.39
Recency 26 April 2010 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3000 Max-Q has a 470% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 23% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5800 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
FireStream 9170 FireStream 9170
vs
L40G L40G
Stream Processor Stream Processor
vs
Tegra X1 GPU X1 GPU
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
GT 420M GT 420M
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 FireGL V5700
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
GT 330 OEM GT 330 OEM
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
ATI V5800 DVI FirePro V5800 DVI
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
ATI V7800 FirePro V7800
vs
GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-8
ATI V7750 FirePro V7750
vs
RX 560 896SP RX 560 896SP
ATI 2450 Multi-View FirePro 2450 Multi-View
vs
Quadro4 380 XGL Quadro4 380 XGL

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5800 or Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.