GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs ATI FirePro V5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
V3700 V3750 V3800 V4800 V5700 V5800 V5800 DVI V7760 V7770 V7800 V8750 V9800
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460M 460M SLI 470M 470M SLI 480M 480M SLI 485M 485M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5800 with GeForce GTX 460M SLI, including specs and performance data.

ATI V5800
2010, $479
1 GB GDDR5, 74 Watt
3.40

460M SLI outperforms V5800 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
GTX 460M SLI GTX 460M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking797708
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency3.55no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameJuniperN11E-GS
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 April 2010 (16 years ago)3 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800384
Core clock speed690 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Wattno data
Texture fill rate27.60no data
Floating-point processing power1.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2x1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p35−40
−48.6%
52
+48.6%
Full HD45−50
−48.9%
67
+48.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.64no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how ATI V5800 and GTX 460M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460M SLI is 49% faster in 900p
  • GTX 460M SLI is 49% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.40 4.60
Recency 26 April 2010 3 September 2010

GTX 460M SLI has a 35% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
GTX 460M SLI GeForce GTX 460M SLI
vs
GT 650M SLI GeForce GT 650M SLI
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
ATI V4800 FirePro V4800
vs
RTX 5090 Mobile 5090 Mobile
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
GT 650M 650M
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
HD 7730M 7730M
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
HD 6290 6290
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
FirePro W2100 W2100
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
FX 770M 770M
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
GT 720 720
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
510 OEM 510 OEM
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
HD 7670M Rebrand 7670M Rebrand
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
vs
6610 XL 6610 XL

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5800 or GeForce GTX 460M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.