GeForce MX250 vs ATI FirePro V4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data44.09
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRedwoodGP108B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 April 2010 (16 years ago)20 February 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400384
Core clock speed775 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1038 MHz
Number of transistors627 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate15.5024.91
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2024
L1 Cache40 KB144 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce MX250 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 590% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V4800 and GeForce MX250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V4800 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce MX250 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1734 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V4800 or GeForce MX250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.