GeForce 9500M GE vs FirePro V3900

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1033not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Power efficiency2.34no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameTurksMCP79Mx + NB9M
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2012 (14 years ago)9 January 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48024
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort 1.1no data
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2012 9 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 25 Watt

FirePro V3900 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

9500M GE, on the other hand, has 696% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3900 and GeForce 9500M GE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 102 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3900 or GeForce 9500M GE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.